The Iraqi Monstrosity

July 19th, 2005 | by Todd W |

A potential draft of the Iraqi Bill of Rights ‘leaked’ out on the net today, and I couldn’t resist taking a look.

I would have been better served gouging my eyes from my head.

While it is a far improvement over what existed before the US invasion, it falls far short from any meaningful representation of freedom. If this comes to pass, Iraq will not last more then twenty years as a ‘free’ nation. At best it will end up being France, at worst, a banana republic akin to South and Central America.

Some specific provisions, and why they are the kernals of Evil.

Article 1, section 3. Any individual with another nationality (except for Israel) may obtain Iraqi nationality after a period of residency inside the borders of Iraq of not less than ten years for an Arab or twenty years for any other nationality, as long as he has good character and behavior, and has no criminal judgment against him from the Iraqi authorities during the time of his residency on the territory of the Iraqi republic.

Article 1, section 4. An Iraqi may have more than one nationality as long as the nationality is not Israeli.

Except Israel? Let’s just start codifying hatred right out of the gate. I don’t know how many Israelis would seek Iraqi citizenship, but such language doesn’t bode well for our hopes of a more open and tolerant form of Islam springing up any time soon in the Middle East.

All from Article 1.

8. Iraqi women have the right to grant Iraqi nationality to their children and likewise to their (non-Iraqi) husbands after five years have passed from the marriage contract provided that the husband is resident in Iraq.

9. A woman married to someone with Iraqi nationality or who has been naturalized has the right to earn Iraqi nationality.

10. All Iraqis are equal and have the right to acquire or earn Iraqi nationality and to pass it to their spouses and children.

I don’t really see the point of sections 8 and 9 if section 10 states that ALL Iraqis are equal. Why stipulate specific clauses for Iraqi woman and then turn around and say that all are equal? Maybe this is just a revision problem?

Article 3. All Iraqis are equal before the law and equal in the rights that they enjoy by virtue of citizenship just as they are equal in the duties that are imposed upon them by virtue of citizenship without regard to gender, opinion, belief, nationality, religion, sect, or origin.

Take care when confronting an organizing document that speaks of both rights and duties in the same breath. How many Bill of Rights speak of duties of the citizen? What does this have to do with the inalienable rights enjoyed by citizens?

Article 5, Section 1. People are equal in their humanity and human dignity. Their humanity is protected and honored. Social justice is the basis of building the society. The Iraqi people are one people, unified by belief and the unity of the homeland and culture. Anything that exposes this unity to danger is forbidden.

Social Justice? Precisely what does that mean, beyond the typical Leftist speech about elevating the ‘downtrodden’ and doling out equal helpings of suffering to all? And note that the state reserves the right to FORBID anything that endangers the unity of the social structure. So much for legal dissent. This is akin to outlawing Flag Burning, only writ large. Reprehensible speech MUST be protected.

Article 5 Section 4. The state shall ensure harmony between the duties of woman toward her family and her work in the society and equality with men in the fields of political, social, and economic life without conflicting with or disturbing the provisions of the Islamic shari‘a.

Good old Shari’a Law. Just what we need, a nod to Islam in the founding document. Great.

Article 5 Section 9. The state shall guarantee the realization of the social guarantee necessary for citizens in case of old age, disease, inability to work, or if they are homeless, orphans, widowed, or unemployed. It shall provide them social insurance services and health care and protect them from the talons of ignorance, fear, and want, providing them with housing, and special programs to train them and care for them. A law shall be issued regarding this.

The nanny state, codified.

Article 5, Section 10. The state shall support, in accordance with law, the families of martyrs, guaranteeing the legitimate rights taken by the fallen regime.

MARTYRS? I have no idea what this means, but it can’t be good. Skipping ahead a bit. There’s enough outrage in each section to keep yourself amused should you wish.

Article 6, Section 3. Freedom of opinion, expression, publishing, printing, the press, advertising, media, meeting, peaceful demonstration, founding political parties, unions, and associations are guaranteed in accordance with the law. No one may be arrested or have his freedom restricted because of his belief, political thoughts, or religious convictions. The idea of the
Ba‘th party is absolutely forbidden and it is not permitted to be a part of political pluralism.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. Not an absolute statement of freedom, as it can be curtailed through the legislative process. This isn’t a foundation document. It is worse than useless. In the United States, until the Kelo Decision, we could rely on our Constitution as the final arbitrator of dispute. It served as the prime document. Here, this includes built in language to permit it to be cast aside through ordinary legislative action. I can think of nothing more frightening.

As for the exclusion of the Ba’th party, I don’t know how you can forbid an idea. To even speak that way disturbs me. I can understand the desire to repress the evil past, but the strength in a society is it’s ability to compete with reprehensible ideas, out in the open and without fear.

Article 6, section 4. There is no censorship on newspapers, printing, publishing, advertising, or media except by law.

Except by law….

Article 7. Iraqi citizens have the right to enjoy security and free health care. The Iraqi federal government and regional governments must provide it and expand the fields of prevention, treatment, and medication by the construction of various hospitals and health institutions.

I don’t think I need to comment on the horror of this Article.

Article twelve, section 1. Work is a right for every Iraqi citizen and a duty for him. The state and the governments of the regions shall strive to provide work opportunities for every able-bodied citizen.

Again with the right and duty. We now not only have the right to work, but work is compulsory? And the government has to provide a job? We fought for this?

Article Twelve, Sections 4 and 5. No one may be required to undertake a specific task unless that task has a public benefit in accordance with law or in the case of staving off a sudden public danger.

5. Compulsory service (the corvee), slavery, the slave trade, forced labor, or any work that is imposed on the Iraq citizen not in accordance with the provisions of the constitution or the law are forbidden.

Let me translate that one. “Slave trade and force labor is outlawed, unless the state is the slaver, then it is ok.” Can there be a more covert expression of Evil? The day the first man discovered the magical power of the phrase ‘the public good’ is the day we all had chains slapped on our wrists.

Article 13, section 1. Public and private freedoms are protected provided they do not conflict with moral values and public decency.

Nothing like a Decleration of Rights by consensus. The true Rights of Man are not granted by Man. They come from Nature (or God if you prefer). Our Constitution is an expression of recognition of these natural rights. This abortion of a document is a statement of rights granted as a gift from a society that explicitly recognizes it’s own power to curtail rights at the whim of those in power. This guarantees nothing, and provides the illusion of freedom. Far better to live without laws than to give these ‘laws’ the sanction of legitimacy.

I encourage you to read the rest. Guns are banned, taxes are elevated to be ’sacrocant’, and all Iraqis are held in bondage to the public good. It is a nightmare of a document.

My optimism in Iraq has just evaporated.

  1. One Response to “The Iraqi Monstrosity”

  2. By Mike J on Jul 19, 2005 | Reply

    I am speechless with rage. Why do we let these barbarians play at making a society? Far better for us to force our way of life and laws upon them than to allow them to enslave themselves with this - thing.

    This doccument’s main thrust is that the Law is God, and that God is Allah. What hope is there for a nation that bases its law on something so primitive and at odds with the inalianable rights of man as the Koran? Far be it from me to judge those who live in mental slavery to some book written by a desert cheiftan’s follower (the Koran), but why should we as the USA allow Iraq to make its own law? Why isn’t ours superior, and thus the only option for them?

    Did we allow Germany or Japan to make their own laws after WW2? Of course not, and the laws we made for them have served them pretty well. Japan still has its constitution, and Germany is the greatest economy in Europe. Why wouldn’t a carbon-copy of the US Constitution be good enough for Iraqis? Because it doesn’t strip women and Jews of enough freedoms? Because it doesn’t give the State total power over the individual? Tell me how the Iraqi thing is superior.

    I say we pull out now, and when the inevitable dictator arises we murder him for the world to see. I didn’t re-elect Bush to see this happen. I wanted Iraq to be free, not to enslave itself with its very founding documents!

Post a Comment